Ik heb weer een klusje voor je ;-) Kan je een aantal interwikilinks toevoegen aan Special:Interwiki? Net zoals op de Engelse Wikivoyage: en:Special:Interwiki. Met name de dmoz-link is nodig, omdat er nu veel rode links op pagina's komen met een dmoz-interwikiverwijzing. --Globe-trotter (overleg) 12 okt 2012 11:31 (CEST)
- Misschien beter eens vragen aan de andere admin die hier actief is, Rein heeft meer kennis van de technische zaken dan ik. - Gentenaar (overleg) 12 okt 2012 11:53 (CEST)
Zou je mijn accounts kunnen samenvoegen? Zie Overleg Wikivoyage:User account migration. Ook staan er nog een aantal andere taken open voor administrators/bureaucrats op Wikivoyage:Opruimen. --Globe-trotter (overleg) 27 nov 2012 01:32 (UTC)
An important message about renaming usersBewerken
Dear Rein N., My aplogies for writing in English. Please translate or have this translated for you if it will help. I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.
As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.
Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.
The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.
Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.
In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.
Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.
Your abusive blockBewerken
Since you preferred not to answer anymore on Commons, I have now to write here. Please, can you state - why did you block me for 1 week, including revocation of talk page and wikimail access? Let's be clear: yes, there was an edit war in article Delhi. But an edit war always takes at least two participants and the other participant, namely User:FredTC, had reverted as well, and did not even bother to provide a valid reason for his reverts! So, once again: it seems that you blocked me for allegedly destructive editing, but where is vandaism in your opinion? What was wrong on my desire to replace a poor quality, poorly lightened picture by a new picture of the same motif and that is alrealdy a quality image on Commons, which means that it meets the Image guidelines which are recommendend for all projects including Wikivoyage? In fact, after blocking me you even did not reverted my edit - no one reverted it except FredTC - and a couple of days after that he reinstalled the old picture again, playing on my block. So, given that, can you please tell me who is actually edit-warring? Again, what was wrong on my edit? Where is vandalism by me? Did you ever read Assume good faith? Wikivoyage is not a private wiki like Wikitravel, it is a project by Wikimedia Foundation, which means that the WMF's guidelines are applicable for you as well! Please answer: what was - in your opinion - wrong on my edit? Otherwise, I expect from you to delete the block entry from my log, and to revert FredTC in Delhi article. Thanks --A.Savin (overleg) 12 jun 2016 13:47 (CEST)
Few pages needs to be cleaned up after maintenanceBewerken
Sorry for writing in English.
Hello, after recent maintenace that was done on your wiki, a few of pages that were previously inaccessible are accessible again. Some of those pages couldn't be fixed, because their name was taken by another page. For that reason, I've moved those pages to start with
T173070. I'd like ask you to review those pages, move them to correct title or delete them, if they are no longer needed. You can find the list of pages that needs maintenance in the output of the maintenance script. If you need any help with this, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 27 jun 2019 23:15 (CEST)